tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11336670.post1339408714690100949..comments2024-03-13T03:24:01.167-04:00Comments on Marginalizing Morons: Uplifiting "Forward"CaptiousNuthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14440029537418230507noreply@blogger.comBlogger15125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11336670.post-28834082750878396002009-09-15T23:12:29.606-04:002009-09-15T23:12:29.606-04:00C,
Oh, so you reject objective truth in favor of ...C,<br /><br />Oh, so you reject objective truth in favor of relativity, then?<br /><br />You can do better than this but you choose not to, sadly. Fine, I'll leave you alone about it.Taylor Conanthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18270678440957992085noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11336670.post-42926906729695425142009-09-15T22:56:50.851-04:002009-09-15T22:56:50.851-04:00huff - 1. a mood of sulking anger; a fit of resent...<a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/huff" rel="nofollow">huff</a> - 1. a mood of sulking anger; a fit of resentment: <em>Just because you disagree, don't walk off in a huff</em>.<br /><br />Superb diction here!<br /><br />AND, dictionary.com's usage example looks *TAYLOR*-made as well!<br /><br />*Objective truth*....<br /><br />Okay, Aristotle.<br /><br />Don't go by the time-stamps. This response took me only 1 minute and 37 seconds. Let the record show that I was exhausted to boot!CaptiousNuthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14440029537418230507noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11336670.post-67458069949625561412009-09-12T20:54:54.507-04:002009-09-12T20:54:54.507-04:00C,
I take your stubbornness on this to be some de...C,<br /><br />I take your stubbornness on this to be some delay tactic or something. If your position is the objective truth you should be able to convince me of it and change my mind. If it's just a personal preference/opinion/hunch, there's certainly no reason for us to sit and debate something like that.<br /><br />Truly unfortunate that this is the response I get every single time I debate a topic like this. You, that Ken Silber douchebag, my old econ prof... seems I am either too stupid/simple/ignorant/unimportant to be teachable on how obviously I am wrong on all of this. Disappointing, to say the least and I don't feel respected, but maybe I don't deserve it? That's the message I am getting.<br /><br />Consider me in a huff.Taylor Conanthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18270678440957992085noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11336670.post-39438435863345427512009-09-12T20:45:48.465-04:002009-09-12T20:45:48.465-04:00I would like to eliminate the *bigger half*.
Beca...I would like to eliminate the *bigger half*.<br /><br />Because that makes the most sense.<br /><br />(Took me a while to compose this retort.)CaptiousNuthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14440029537418230507noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11336670.post-90123501549455812792009-09-10T15:14:36.694-04:002009-09-10T15:14:36.694-04:00C,
Which half and why?
In other words, in explai...C,<br /><br />Which half and why?<br /><br />In other words, in explaining the why you need to demonstrate how it is logically consistent and not arbitrary to reject one half of the government and not the other half.Taylor Conanthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18270678440957992085noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11336670.post-85288831698179722022009-09-10T14:19:04.512-04:002009-09-10T14:19:04.512-04:00The logical premises are not identical - that was ...The logical premises are not identical - that was precisely my point.<br /><br />Perhaps your misunderstanding comes from reading and responding too quickly to my comment?<br /><br />That is....if I'm also permitted to grade comments based upon *response time*.<br /><br />You believe the state should be eliminated, right?<br /><br />Well I believe it should only be halved.CaptiousNuthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14440029537418230507noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11336670.post-89336033191070277922009-09-09T23:41:02.439-04:002009-09-09T23:41:02.439-04:00C,
That took you a long time to try to weasel aro...C,<br /><br />That took you a long time to try to weasel around to that, didn't it?<br /><br />That's great that you think that that is the biggest problem. I don't even necessarily disagree. <br /><br />That wasn't my point. My point was that the logical premises are IDENTICAL in those two statements. You must believe both or neither to be consistent. If you say you only believe one, you are inconsistent and illogical in this regard. So, which is it? Both, neither or illogical inconsistency?Taylor Conanthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18270678440957992085noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11336670.post-32253262745828058682009-09-09T21:58:59.893-04:002009-09-09T21:58:59.893-04:00Healthcare is more distorted than subsidized.
IMO...Healthcare is more distorted than subsidized.<br /><br />IMO, the biggest problem with healthcare is the regulation, not the subsidy (on income tax line and/or for uninsured ER drop-ins).<br /><br />So I am for the depoliticization of the market, not reactionary gestures like fatty food bans and whatnot.<br /><br />I say, let insurance companies discriminate based upon the healthiness of their customers.CaptiousNuthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14440029537418230507noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11336670.post-26195355411784645102009-09-07T21:57:11.858-04:002009-09-07T21:57:11.858-04:00C,
I won't have this debate with you because ...C,<br /><br />I won't have this debate with you because it's pointless and you're wrong.<br /><br />Here's your argument, in another form, you tell me what's wrong with it:<br /><br />"I just don't see how we can let people smoke and eat fatty foods so long as their poor choices will result in higher healthcare costs for all of us. End subsidized healthcare and then we can end indoor smoking prohibitions and saturated fat regulations."<br /><br />Or maybe you agree with that reasoning now, too? Shared premises so you must agree with neither or both.Taylor Conanthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18270678440957992085noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11336670.post-40479986905810352682009-09-07T21:14:15.583-04:002009-09-07T21:14:15.583-04:00I just don't see how allowing millions of illi...I just don't see how allowing millions of illiterates to come here and get free stuff (education, medicine, welfare, etc.)....<br /><br />And then have them naturalized and given EVEN MORE entitlements like gov't jobs, minority contracts, etc....<br /><br />I don't see how that will mitigate extant *socialism*.<br /><br />End the welfare state before ending the *police state*, then we can open up the borders, IMO.CaptiousNuthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14440029537418230507noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11336670.post-6829045722503234422009-09-07T19:14:53.317-04:002009-09-07T19:14:53.317-04:00C,
Sheriff Joe seems to be tinkering on a model f...C,<br /><br />Sheriff Joe seems to be tinkering on a model for a police state/prison-camp socialism that one day might be out of prototype and into working beta, at which point we can all have a personal try at it! Go socialism! So uplifting.<br /><br />Maricopa County has major, major, major police corruption issues. Sounds like most of the PDs over there are suffering from "Occupying Force Syndrome."<br /><br />Police state socialism-- one of the many benefits of 'illegal' immigration warfare!<br /><br />Try this link: http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=site%3Alewrockwell.com+%2B+%22maricopa+county%22&aq=f&aqi=&oq=&fp=a914d81610aa54b4<br /><br />And if your own google search skills are up to snuff (mine aren't apparently) look for more on the county by William Norman Grigg or search his blog, freedominourtime.blogspot.com he's written about that cesspool of a county quite a bit. Enjoy the edification!<br /><br />(Luckily the pigs don't always win down in Maricopa, just most of the time: http://saltypig.com/blog/2004/12/judge-police-raid-of-hells-angels-was.htm)Taylor Conanthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18270678440957992085noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11336670.post-55441220651367209852009-09-07T03:09:48.087-04:002009-09-07T03:09:48.087-04:00I am from phoenix, he is real :)
But there is oth...I am from phoenix, he is real :)<br /><br />But there is other side of every story, and liberals/dems dont like him so much as u would guess.<br /><br />http://www.arpaio.com/index.php<br /><br />But his anti-illegal-alien work is commendable. I dont understand why implementing (illegal immigration) laws is so controversial.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11336670.post-17944033440247193002009-09-06T23:06:33.158-04:002009-09-06T23:06:33.158-04:00I guess there are not too many criminal rights att...I guess there are not too many criminal rights attorneys in Sheriff Joe's county. It is hot out there.Paul Mitchellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07825674914008378242noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11336670.post-64012201161330425432009-09-06T22:59:44.986-04:002009-09-06T22:59:44.986-04:00Yeah I happened upon a story about *tent city* tha...Yeah I happened upon a story about *tent city* that was from 1999.<br /><br />I like how he's not intimidated by *the law*....how he offered cable TV but narrowed down the channels.<br /><br />Mayor Bloomberg seems to be a similarly resourceful operator - notwithstanding his *green* fetish.CaptiousNuthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14440029537418230507noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11336670.post-52187857574544584532009-09-06T22:39:02.401-04:002009-09-06T22:39:02.401-04:00Definitely real and definitely getting in trouble ...Definitely real and definitely getting in trouble with Janet Napolitano because he is rounding up illegals now.<br /><br />He started the tent city years ago and still runs it, too.Paul Mitchellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07825674914008378242noreply@blogger.com