Here's Fidelity Investments' Chairman
Ned Johnson the other day:
"Until the end of August, before the economic storm arrived, Fidelity’s results were on schedule," Chairman Edward C. "Ned" Johnson III, wrote in a letter to shareholders accompanying the report. Then in September, "we entered a downdraft in stock prices which hasn’t been seen since the ‘30s," Johnson wrote.
So it's all the market's fault?
And here's his zinger that got him atop DrudgeReport.com yesterday:
"We can only hope that the government’s cure doesn’t further sicken the patient," Johnson wrote. "During the ‘30s, Congress -- with guidance from the president and the same kind of good intentions -- shifted the country’s cash flow away from productive business to government make-work projects, which most likely prolonged the Great Depression."
Okay. Now, usually I'm all for a good little swipe at *
Big Government* but this statement, from this man, is a screaming deflection.
The fact is,
Fidelity is a disastrous operation. It's bloated, jurassic, and severely underperforming.
Here on the South Shore of Boston, seemingly everyone I meet works for Fidelity. This local sub-population, they are by no means
Morons, but let me just tell you, they make gobs of money.
And for what?
You know how it is - in good times, quacks and hucksters skate by, but when the going gets tough....they get exposed big time.
That's the story of Fidelity right now. A turbulent market has exposed their well-concealed incompetence. Fidelity has proven to be nothing more than a giant bull market skimming operation. Look at their latest sophistical
propaganda that tries to persuade its ravaged clients (and new suckers) to *keep buying*. Heck, the numbers it uses are hardly compelling:
Fidelity nicknamed one of the market timers the "bear-market dodger." After the start of the downturn in March 2000, for instance, he shifted new contributions to cash, beginning in April 2000.
A second market timer, the "bear-market refugee," shifted new contributions once the bear market was official — hit the 20% down threshold — to cash starting in March 2001.
The third timer was dubbed the "doomsday capitulator." He shifted new money to cash at the market's low point in October 2002.
The three timers resumed investing in stocks as of January 2004. In the real market, that was when investors' cash weightings fell back to their long-term averages as investors returned to stocks, Fidelity says. Going forward, each portfolio got the bogey's 10.2% average yearly gains from 1927 to August 2008.
January 2004 was also the point in time when Fidelity measured how each strategy had fared.
After plowing in $34,000, the stay-the-course investor's account balance was $33,502. That was bigger than the other three investors' by 0.4%, 5.1% and 5.6%, respectively.
Still, Fidelity says if the account exists for another 30 years, stay-the-course investor's $617,331 balance is $2,671 more than dodger's, $31,380 more than refugee's, and $34,752 more than capitulator's.
A difference of 30k, over 30 years? That's supposed to be significant?
Note the so-called dodgers got to sleep at night - a point totally unquantified, totally unaddressed by the
buy-buy-buy propaganda.
Furthermore, why don't we recalculate the numbers INCLUDING *buying* in 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008?!?!?!
Yeah I don't think those particular dollar-cost averages would behoove the ridiculous propaganda....we'll just leave them out and keep it quiet.
Everything I hear, read, or witness about Fidelity these days just screams incompetence, AND stupidity.
It wasn't bad enough that Fidelity got its clocked clean last year buying financials, apparently it went
bargain hunting again late in 2008:
Fidelity Investments, the world’s largest mutual-fund company, more than doubled its stake in Citigroup Inc. in the fourth quarter, ahead of a 63 percent slide in the stock this year.
Fidelity also added shares of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Wells Fargo & Co. in the fourth quarter. JPMorgan shares are down 35 percent this year; Wells Fargo shares are down 59 percent. Fidelity owns 4 percent of JPMorgan and 5.2 percent of Wells Fargo.
One local Fidelity guy, an analyst or something, told me back in September to load up on the *best* stock on Wall Street. He said to buy
Starwood Hotels. Since his recommendation in September, the stock has fallen 69%, from 37.00 to 11.42 today!
Why exactly is he making 600k (or more!) per year and I am sitting at home flipping odd lots?
Well probably because the PMs, the portfolio managers, at Fidelity fancy his useless research, or his personality.
Out of the dozen or so Fidelity employees I've met since I moved to this region, I've yet to hear of one of them getting laid off. I'm telling you, they make GOBS of money.
That company is in deep denial and won't bite the bullet until after another nasty *down year* for the markets.
Firing all their analysts and all their *mouthpieces* - as they should do - would be to admit that the entire company is, and has been, a fraud.
Though, in Ned Johnson's defense, this fraud was fueled by the laziness and stupidity of passive investors.
Mrs. C-Nut hates it when I bash asset managers. She sees nothing philosophically wrong with an industry that skims money from unsuspecting, deserving
Morons.
I look at it egotistically. There's no way I could spend my time and energy fine-tuning investment strategies and marketing schemes that demand *victims* - just so I could live in big house, in a desirable neighborhood, and drive a nice car (to the train station!).
See also -
Marginalizing Analysts and
Skim Biz Update - Fidelity Investments.
