Wednesday, September 05, 2007

Homeownership Sucks!



I know a guy who, unfortunately is amidst a divorce and has left his 3,700 square foot, 100 year-old Victorian house and moved into a 3 bedroom rental apartment. He insists that aside from all the other issues implicit in a divorce, he is loving renting now. He has nothing to worry about fixing or renovating. He no longer comes home to annoyances like leaky faucets; he no longer frets about peeling paint or creaky steps. Now he just comes home from work and can finally relax.

My wife and I considered buying a decrepit Victorian house in Waltham and he, coming from the unimpeachable perch of experience, essentially said not to do it. Asked if he went back in time, would he still buy his old Victorian, this guy said he would only buy the house if he were "young and dumb."

This was one of the points I argued with my wife when we were jawboning buying a few places earlier this year. Every little repair job in a house is a burden on the MAN. He's the one that has to diagnose and research every little issue. He's the one who has to manage plumbers and contractors as they try to ravage his wallet. I told my wife that renting allows me to sleep at night - a luxury of almost unquantifiable value.

So I am here in my new place four weeks now. The rails on the staircase are falling off, the window sills outside need paint, the glass door on the shower is hanging by a thread, both the seal and the lock on the back door are in disrepair, the pump in the air conditioner has been broken and fixed twice recently, and there's probably some more stuff I can't remember at this instant. Again, this is only over the past four weeks!

Then this week my landlord got hit with two more little disasters. The blower on the septic tank went - cost $770. And, in the course of trying to convert the heating system from oil to gas he not only obviously needed to buy a new boiler - costing a few grand, it turns out the chimney that houses the exhaust also has all sorts of problems. It has a crumbling interior of asbestos, terra cotta, or some other junk; it had to be swept/vacuumed out and now needs a new steel liner. This will run around $1,800 - so they say. It might even make sense to completely rebuild the chimney, given the total cost.



So yes, I truly believe that Homeownership Sucks. It is completely overrated AND it makes no economic sense given that rental costs are roughly 70% of purchase costs nationwide. In Florida, they are down to 60%.

How many times have you recently heard Morons say they bought a condo because they didn't want to deal with yard work and upkeep?

Notwithstanding the premium of buying over renting a place, it makes perfect sense that an abode with outsourced upkeep should cost more than a place where dwellers are responsible for every little maintenance problem.

Devil's Advocate - No, those condos pool their upkeep costs, spread them over more people, so they'd be cheaper to maintain than individual units.

Now that's a great little theory, but have you ever seen low condo fees out in the real world? I haven't.

Added to that is the bickering amongst condo owners over management decisions. How often should the grass be watered? How much to spend on flowers for the common roadway? I know a new tony condo development in Port Washington, NY that is already awash in management strife. There was a big brouhaha about how long the parking lot lights would be left on at night. The cheap old folk wanted to save money on electricity. Remember, that's what fossils do whether they are rich or not - they run around turning lights off.

As I sit here typing this, my landlord is outside trying to remove a sliding glass door and re-glue the insulation. It's a little complicated to extricate such a door but he's hoping to avoid calling a carpenter.

I gave my wife last night the litany of things that have gone wrong in our first month. I chuckled that I love having a landlord because it's like having a handyman, on call, for free!

What could possibly be more ideal?

In this hectic age where consumers highly value their free time, don't y'all think that free maintenance and outsourced upkeep should demand a premium?

In other words, it should be cheaper to buy than to rent a given house that's replete with the on-call handyman.

Sometimes the market prices of our world really are upside down.

UPDATE - Door couldn't be fixed by owner. Carpenter has been called.

9 comments:

Charlie said...

Hey dude. I love your blog. Visit my blog at any time during the day, and feel free to comment on anything you wish.
Go to my webpage at: http:www.andypanda-charlie.blogspot.com
I would love to hear from you.

TAYLOR said...

Well aren't the "market prices" obviously topsy-turvy because of Fed intervention in the market? If you expand credit to bad risks in the home ownership sector while not doing the same in rentals, won't that create excess demand in owned homes and therefore drive the price up past its normal equilibrium?

I guess part of the problem you're describing mostly pertains to old homes, as well. If you could scrape together the dough for a new build, you might not have as many problems, at least not for ten years or so.

Definitely see what you're saying, and maybe you're right given the realities of today's market, but it sure is weird to think that you're right and that renting is superior to owning. After all, it's always poor folk who receive criticism for renting everything in their homes rather than saving up and buying it.

CaptiousNut said...

taylor,

Most everyone is "renting".

Just because they do not realize it, it doesn't mean that mortgagers aren't simply renting money.

TAYLOR said...

Well I realize that, actually. I was going to ask again if one benefit of ownership might be that in the event of an economic downturn you will still have a place to live for sure, but since most people mortgage most people would probably lose their homes anyway, as they are merely renting from the bank.

Isn't it closer to leasing, however? Renting connotes you're definitely giving back at the end, whereas with a lease you MIGHT give it back or you might buy out at the end.

Monkeydarts said...

I don't know about that "Homeownership Sucks!" title Cap. My wife and I have owned a succession of 5 homes. Seven years after retiring at the age of 45 we let the 4th house buy the 5th one for us. No mortgage; so we don't "rent" or "lease" the house we "own." When we downsize in another 5-10 years this house will buy our next one. Home ownership for us has been a crucial component of the realization of the American Dream-- we started married life with ZERO money in the bank and a willingness to work our asses off.
However, crabgrass sucks.

CaptiousNut said...

Monkeydarts,

Do the math, you would have made a bunch more if you borrowed and put that money in the stock market.

For sure, if you buy your first home at the bottom of a cycle, you can create some real wealth. But for everyone who buys at the bottom, there are probably two people who buy at the top.

LiveWorkDream.com said...

I completely agree!

Anonymous said...

nice blog. Homeownership does suck. Paying over 1/4 a mil on a sucky old condo in DC area, now 4 years later, and 40k worth of upgrades, i'm going to closing, for 1/4 a mil, and paying for my buyers closing costs and down payment (not to mention the 14k in commissions). Had to borrow from my retirement fund just to sell this place.

Never buying a home again.

JW said...

I've linked to this on my own site. Excellent work.