Wednesday, May 23, 2012
So they *stabilized* the stock....even though it went down faster than a Jersey girl on prom night...
And somehow they stabilized without buying the stock - BECAUSE that form of stabilization would surely have resulted in monetary losses, sizable ones at that.
I don't know. It's a stupid article that can't possibly be true in any way shape of form.
Just about everything, and I mean 99.7% of what Big Media spits out is pure BS if not outright falsehood. They just manipulate Morons with sensational headlines and by pushing emotional hot-buttons.
Unless the overall market rallies yet again....I could see this stock at $16, easily by Christmas.